The Digital Native Myth

TxDLA 2008 Blog

Matt CrosslinWe’ve been having an interesting side conversation on the Micro-blog. It started off with me saying this:

“Almost made the whole day without hearing my least favorite term “digital immigrant.”

It seems like whenever I bring up the term digital native or digital immigrant, I get at least a few (if not more) stories from teachers that can’t seem to find many of these “digital natives” out there. Those of us that are ready to let the students loose in the digital world that they are supposedly native to are getting blank stares from said students. I polled my wife’s 9th grade class last year and found that most of them had no idea what a blog was. Really – no clue. Do you know why? They don’t own a computer at home. Over 80% of them didn’t. There is this thing called the digital divide that is very real and very ignored.

Chris Duke sent me a link to an excellent blog post he wrote called “Millenials” are NOT different learners!! I think he makes an excellent point:

“Millenials have the opportunity to learn with grander and newer technologies than the those available to their teachers when their teachers were in secondary or undergraduate education.”

So, in other words, learning is the same – it’s just that society has changed and given our natural desire to learn new directions to grow that were not available just a decade ago. We’re tapping in to stuff that we always wanted, but just didn’t have the technology to do.

But I digress… my original point was how I despise the term digital native. Just because someone was born a certain year does not mean they will have access to a computer and therefore become a native. Now, there are those that grow up with a computer at home and they technically are a digital native. But there is also this implication that they are automatically more tech-savy than any given digital immigrant on any given day. This is just not true. Think about all of the people that you know who are true early adopters. I am thinking of some now… and no natives are coming to mind. I am usually the one convincing my 20 year old sister-in-law that she needs to sign up for a new website. Not the other way around.

I’ve been blogging on this subject a while on my main blog (EduGeek Journal). Here are more thoughts of mine on this subject (the first link is where I half-jokingly suggest some new terms to use and get some funny responses):

You Were Born a Digital Native. Now What?
Survey Says… (shattering online myths of digital natives)
The World is Not Flat – It is a Plateau

Now, I do recognize that there are differences with every generation. Always has been, always will be. We need to know what these differences are. But won’t focusing so much unnecessary attention on the differences just serve to drive a larger wedge between “us” and “them”? There are also huge similarities. We should stop acting like younger generations are an entirely different species than us. Recognize the differences, but like our keynote taught us this morning – learn to focus on the positive stuff that is there.

Update: Sorry there were some broken links – got those repaired….

2 thoughts on “The Digital Native Myth

  1. George Siemens, on his Connectivism Blog http://connectivism.ca/blog/2007/10/digital_natives_and_immigrants.html wrote about this last October. He makes some interesting points and those who commented have more to add.

    Also, David Thornburg apologized in a blog post for using the term: http://thornburgcenter.blogspot.com/2007/10/tl-conference-and-apology.html

    Jamie McKenzie writes his indictment of the term last November: http://fno.org/nov07/nativism.html

    All of this to say that we have to be careful with our labels and generalizations. We must be discerning with these kinds of divisive ideas or we’ll end up with a digital Lord of the Flies with our kids on the island without us.

  2. Thanks Rick – excellent resources there. I also agree with your last sentence there – well stated.

    WordPress messed up the coding on your post a little so that two of the links didn’t quite work when clicked on – I edited the comment very slightly to fix that.

    I’m sure Prensky has come out and said that people are taking his comments the wrong way. But I’ve been to at least two sessions of his, and all of the links are pretty accurate summaries of what was implied at those sessions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *